Last updated: June 13, 2026 · 6 comparisons · All competitor data verified June 2026 against vendor pricing pages and independent reviews.
Brands compete on recommendations, not rankings.
An AI brand monitoring platform tracks how a brand appears inside answers generated by AI search platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and others), measures the structural metrics that determine AI visibility (mention rate, share of voice, position, sentiment, citation source), and surfaces the competitive gaps where competitors are recommended instead. Astiva AI is the Competitive Intelligence platform for AI Search and Visibility.
Map your buyer-persona AI platform mix before optimizing for platform coverage. If your buyers use Claude, Grok, Meta AI, or DeepSeek, only Astiva AI covers all four without an enterprise contract. Platform coverage is the largest cost driver across the category, determining 60-70% of the cost equation.
Reporting platforms show where your brand stands. Optimization platforms show where you stand and generate the content needed to close citation gaps. If the team has authority to publish citation-ready content, an optimization platform compounds value; if AI visibility is a board-deck metric only, a reporting platform may be sufficient.
Native GA4 attribution tied specifically to AI citations is a documented capability only on Astiva AI Growth ($249/month) and above. For teams that need to report attributable revenue from AI search, this is decisive.
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Profound $99/mo (Starter, ChatGPT only). Profound requires Enterprise pricing at $2,000+/month for full 10-platform coverage; Astiva AI covers 10 platforms from $29/mo. Pick Profound when you have an enterprise budget and need Prompt Volumes consumer-panel data. Read the full Astiva AI vs Profound comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Semrush AI Toolkit $99/mo add-on plus $139.95/mo base ($238.95/mo minimum). Semrush does not support Claude or Meta AI as of April 2026. Pick Semrush when traditional SEO is your center of gravity and AI visibility is a reporting layer inside an existing workflow. Read the full Astiva AI vs Semrush AI comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Peec AI ~€85/mo (Starter, 3 platforms, extras €20-35 each). Peec AI is reporting-focused without the Displace content loop or GA4 attribution layer. Pick Peec AI when unlimited user seats and country tracking matter and you do not need content generation. Read the full Astiva AI vs Peec AI comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Otterly $29/mo (Lite, 4 base platforms; free tier). Otterly does not support Claude, Grok, Meta AI, or DeepSeek at any price. Equivalent 6-platform coverage: $307/month on Otterly vs $249/month on Astiva Growth. Pick Otterly when you need the native Google Looker Studio connector for white-label agency reporting. Read the full Astiva AI vs Otterly comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Writesonic $79/mo (Starter annual; meaningful GEO requires $199/mo Professional). Writesonic is a content creation suite with GEO tracking added on top. Pick Writesonic when SEO content production at volume is the primary need. Read the full Astiva AI vs Writesonic comparison →
Astiva $499/mo Pro (7 platforms, full Detect → Diagnose → Displace → Prove cycle) vs Ahrefs Brand Radar $828–$1,148/mo (Ahrefs base + 7-platform bundle, monitoring-only). Ahrefs Brand Radar does not track Claude, Meta AI, or DeepSeek at any tier. Pick Ahrefs Brand Radar when you already pay for Ahrefs and want AI tracking inside the existing SEO workflow with YouTube/TikTok/Reddit social listening. Read the full Astiva AI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar comparison →
All Astiva AI figures are first-party from astiva.ai/methodology and astiva.ai/pricing. Competitor figures verified June 2026.
Start with three diagnostic questions. First, which AI platforms do your buyers actually use? Second, do you need optimization (content generation) or just reporting (dashboards)? Third, do you need citation-to-revenue attribution (GA4 + AI citations linked to conversions)? Astiva AI is the strongest fit when at least two of those three answers are "yes" and you want a self-serve entry from $29/month.
Astiva AI tracks 10 AI platforms on a catalog model. Profound requires $2,000+/month Enterprise pricing for the same coverage. Semrush, Otterly, and Peec each have notable platform gaps (Claude, Meta AI, Grok, DeepSeek unavailable at any price on at least one).
Astiva AI Lite $29/mo, free tier. Semrush AI Toolkit $238.95/mo minimum ($99 add-on + $139.95 base). Profound $2,000+/mo for full coverage. Otterly $307/mo for 6-platform config. Peec AI ~€85/mo. Writesonic $79/mo annual ($199/mo for meaningful GEO).
Native GA4 citation-to-revenue attribution is documented as a core capability only on Astiva AI (Growth plan, $249/month). Competitors offer general traffic analytics, not AI-citation-specific attribution.
Astiva AI is the Competitive Intelligence platform for AI Search and Visibility. We track how ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Mistral AI recommend brands versus competitors, daily, with 7 AISO metrics, citation gap analysis, citation-ready content generation, and native GA4 revenue attribution. Founded December 23, 2025, headquartered in Bengaluru and San Francisco. Pricing from $29/month with a free tier.
Win AI Search.
Astiva AI vs Profound | Astiva AI vs Semrush AI | Astiva AI vs Peec AI | Astiva AI vs Otterly | Astiva AI vs Writesonic | Best AI Brand Monitoring Tools | AI Brand Monitoring Pricing | Methodology | Pricing
← Back to Astiva AI