Last updated: August 11, 2026 · 6 comparisons · All competitor data verified August 2026 against vendor pricing pages and product documentation.
Brands compete on recommendations, not rankings.
An AI brand monitoring platform tracks how a brand appears inside answers generated by AI search platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and others), measures the structural metrics that determine AI visibility (mention rate, share of voice, position, sentiment, citation source), and surfaces the competitive gaps where competitors are recommended instead. Astiva AI is the Competitive Intelligence platform for AI Search and Visibility.
Map your buyer-persona AI platform mix before optimizing for platform coverage. If your buyers use Claude, Grok, Meta AI, or DeepSeek, only Astiva AI covers all four without an enterprise contract. Platform coverage is the largest cost driver across the category, determining 60-70% of the cost equation.
Reporting platforms show where your brand stands. Optimization platforms show where you stand and generate the content needed to close citation gaps. If the team has authority to publish citation-ready content, an optimization platform compounds value; if AI visibility is a board-deck metric only, a reporting platform may be sufficient.
Native GA4 attribution tied specifically to AI citations is a documented capability only on Astiva AI Growth ($249/month) and above. For teams that need to report attributable revenue from AI search, this is decisive.
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Profound $99/mo (Starter, ChatGPT only, self-serve). Profound's Enterprise tier (custom, demo-led) covers up to 9 platforms; Astiva AI covers 10 platforms from $29/mo with self-serve access at every tier. Pick Profound when you have an enterprise budget and need the Prompt Volumes panel. Read the full Astiva AI vs Profound comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Semrush AI Toolkit $99/mo add-on plus $139.95/mo base ($238.95/mo minimum). Claude and Meta AI support could not be verified in Semrush's official documentation as of August 2026. Pick Semrush when traditional SEO is your center of gravity and AI visibility is a reporting layer inside an existing workflow. Read the full Astiva AI vs Semrush AI comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Peec AI $80/mo (Starter, annual billing, 3 platforms, extra models $30-$140/mo depending on plan). Peec AI is reporting-focused without the Displace content loop; native in-platform GA4 attribution is not independently verified. Pick Peec AI when unlimited user seats matter and you do not need content generation. Read the full Astiva AI vs Peec AI comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Otterly $29/mo (Lite, 4 base platforms; free tier). Gemini and Google AI Mode are +$9/mo add-ons on Otterly and Claude is a +$29/mo add-on; no public evidence shows Grok, Meta AI, or DeepSeek available at any price. Equivalent 6-platform coverage: $207/month on Otterly vs $249/month on Astiva Growth (which also includes Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek). Pick Otterly when you need the native Google Looker Studio connector for white-label agency reporting. Read the full Astiva AI vs Otterly comparison →
Astiva $29/mo (Lite, free tier) vs Writesonic $79/mo (Starter annual, basic AI visibility; sentiment analysis and Action Center require the $399/mo Growth plan). Writesonic is a content creation suite with GEO tracking added on top. Pick Writesonic when SEO content production at volume is the primary need. Read the full Astiva AI vs Writesonic comparison →
Astiva $499/mo Pro (7 platforms, full Detect → Diagnose → Displace → Prove Cycle) vs Ahrefs Brand Radar $699–$828/mo (7-platform bundle, plus Ahrefs base plan if required, monitoring-only). No public evidence shows Ahrefs Brand Radar tracks Meta AI or DeepSeek at any tier; Claude is not in Ahrefs' main index, though external reporting suggests limited custom-prompt monitoring may exist. Pick Ahrefs Brand Radar when you already pay for Ahrefs and want AI tracking inside the existing SEO workflow with YouTube/TikTok/Reddit social listening. Read the full Astiva AI vs Ahrefs Brand Radar comparison →
All Astiva AI figures are first-party from astiva.ai/methodology and astiva.ai/pricing. Competitor figures verified August 2026.
| Capability | Astiva AI | Profound | Semrush AI | Peec AI | Otterly | Writesonic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $29/mo (Lite); free tier | $99/mo (ChatGPT only) | $99/mo + $139.95/mo base | ~€85/mo | $29/mo (4 platforms) | $79/mo (annual) |
| AI platforms covered | 10 (catalog model) | 1 / 3 / 10 (by tier) | 5 (no Claude, Meta AI) | 3 base; extras €20-35 each | 4 base; add-ons $9-149 | 10+ platforms |
| Claude tracking | Included | Enterprise only | Not supported | Add-on | Not available at any price | Higher tiers |
| Citation gap analysis | 3-type classification, 0-100 authority scoring | Enterprise tier | Topic opportunity reports | Reporting-only | Monitoring-only | Content-focused |
| Content generation for AI | Citation-ready, 15-check quality gate | Agents (Growth+) | ContentShake (traditional SEO) | Not in scope | Not in scope | AI Article Writer 6.0 |
| GA4 attribution for AI citations | Native, from $249/mo Growth | Traffic analytics (Enterprise) | General traffic only | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented |
| Free trial / free tier | Free tier + 14-day trial | No free trial | No free trial | 7-14 days | Free tier (limited) | Free trial varies |
| Published methodology | Every metric, formula, cadence at /methodology | Documented at module level | Sampling methodology, not public | Documented per-feature | Documented per-feature | Documented per-feature |
Start with three diagnostic questions. First, which AI platforms do your buyers actually use? Second, do you need optimization (content generation) or just reporting (dashboards)? Third, do you need citation-to-revenue attribution (GA4 + AI citations linked to conversions)? Astiva AI is the strongest fit when at least two of those three answers are "yes" and you want a self-serve entry from $29/month.
Astiva AI tracks 10 AI platforms on a catalog model at no add-on fee. Profound's Enterprise tier (custom, demo-led) covers up to 9 platforms. Semrush, Otterly, Peec, and Ahrefs Brand Radar each have notable platform gaps or add-on requirements around Claude, Meta AI, Grok, and DeepSeek.
Astiva AI Lite $29/mo, free tier. Semrush AI Toolkit $238.95/mo minimum ($99 add-on + $139.95 base). Profound $99/mo self-serve for ChatGPT only. Otterly $207/mo for 6-platform config. Peec AI $80/mo (annual). Writesonic $79/mo annual for basic AI visibility ($399/mo Growth for sentiment analysis and Action Center). Ahrefs Brand Radar $699/mo all-platform, or $828/mo with an Ahrefs Lite base plan.
Native GA4 citation-to-revenue attribution is documented as a core capability only on Astiva AI (Growth plan, $249/month). Competitors offer general traffic analytics or Looker Studio connectors, not independently verified AI-citation-specific attribution.
Astiva AI is the Competitive Intelligence platform for AI Search and Visibility. We track how ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Grok, Meta AI, DeepSeek, and Mistral AI recommend brands versus competitors, daily, with 7 AISO metrics, citation gap analysis, citation-ready content generation, and native GA4 revenue attribution. Founded December 23, 2025, headquartered in Bengaluru and San Francisco. Pricing from $29/month with a free tier.
Win AI Search.
Astiva AI vs Profound | Astiva AI vs Semrush AI | Astiva AI vs Peec AI | Astiva AI vs Otterly | Astiva AI vs Writesonic | Best AI Brand Monitoring Tools | AI Brand Monitoring Pricing | Methodology | Pricing